Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2009 that mention
  • F1 score
Matsubayashi, Yuichiroh and Okazaki, Naoaki and Tsujii, Jun'ichi
Experiment and Discussion
Table 1 shows the micro and macro averages of F1 scores .
Experiment and Discussion
Moreover, the macro-averaged F1 scores clearly showed improvements resulting from using role groups.
Experiment and Discussion
In Table 2, we show that the micro-averaged F1 score for roles having 10 instances or less was improved (by 15.46 points) when all role groups were used.
F1 score is mentioned in 5 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Stoyanov, Veselin and Gilbert, Nathan and Cardie, Claire and Riloff, Ellen
Coreference Subtask Analysis
The MUC scoring algorithm (Vilain et a1., 1995) computes the F1 score (harmonic mean) of precision and recall based on the identifcation of unique coreference links.
Coreference Subtask Analysis
Precision and recall for a set of documents are computed as the mean over all CEs in the documents and the F1 score of precision and recall is reported.
Resolution Complexity
We then count the number of unique correct/incorrect links that the system introduced on top of the correct partial clustering and compute precision, recall, and F1 score .
F1 score is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: