Introduction | Multilingual learning has been successful for other linguistic induction tasks such as lexicon acquisition, morphological segmentation, and part-of-speech tagging (Genzel, 2005; Snyder and Barzilay, 2008; Snyder et al., 2008; Snyder |
Introduction | lingual constituent, a sequence of part-of-speech tags is drawn from a language-specific distribution. |
Model | We treat the part-of-speech tag sequences of parallel sentences, as well as their |
Model | While this model is deficient —each observed subsequence of part-of-speech tags is generated many times over — its performance is far higher than that of unsupervised PCFGs. |
Model | In the next section we turn to the problem of inference under this model when only the part-of-speech tag sequences of parallel sentences and their word-level alignments are observed. |
Introduction | They have become the workhorse in almost all subareas and components of NLP, including part-of-speech tagging , chunking, named entity recognition and parsing. |
Named Entity Recognition | Part-of-speech tags were used in the top-ranked systems in CoNLL 2003, as well as in many follow up studies that used the data set (Ando and Zhang 2005; Suzuki and Isozaki 2008). |
Named Entity Recognition | LDC refers to the clusters created with the smaller LDC corpus and +pos indicates the use of part-of-speech tags as features. |
Named Entity Recognition | The Top CoNLL 2003 systems all employed gazetteers or other types of specialized resources (e.g., lists of words that tend to co-occur with certain named entity types) in addition to part-of-speech tags . |
Features | Part-of-speech tags were assigned by a maximum entropy tagger trained on the Penn Tree-bank, and then simplified into seven categories: nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, numbers, foreign words, and everything else. |
Features | Part-of-speech tags are not included in the dependency path. |
Previous work | Hearst (1992) used a small number of regular expressions over words and part-of-speech tags to find examples of the hypernym relation. |
Previous work | such as Ravichandran and Hovy (2002) and Pantel and Pennacchiotti (2006) use the same formalism of learning regular expressions over words and part-of-speech tags to discover patterns indicating a variety of relations. |