Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2009 that mention
  • part-of-speech tags
Snyder, Benjamin and Naseem, Tahira and Barzilay, Regina
Introduction
Multilingual learning has been successful for other linguistic induction tasks such as lexicon acquisition, morphological segmentation, and part-of-speech tagging (Genzel, 2005; Snyder and Barzilay, 2008; Snyder et al., 2008; Snyder
Introduction
lingual constituent, a sequence of part-of-speech tags is drawn from a language-specific distribution.
Model
We treat the part-of-speech tag sequences of parallel sentences, as well as their
Model
While this model is deficient —each observed subsequence of part-of-speech tags is generated many times over — its performance is far higher than that of unsupervised PCFGs.
Model
In the next section we turn to the problem of inference under this model when only the part-of-speech tag sequences of parallel sentences and their word-level alignments are observed.
part-of-speech tags is mentioned in 6 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Lin, Dekang and Wu, Xiaoyun
Introduction
They have become the workhorse in almost all subareas and components of NLP, including part-of-speech tagging , chunking, named entity recognition and parsing.
Named Entity Recognition
Part-of-speech tags were used in the top-ranked systems in CoNLL 2003, as well as in many follow up studies that used the data set (Ando and Zhang 2005; Suzuki and Isozaki 2008).
Named Entity Recognition
LDC refers to the clusters created with the smaller LDC corpus and +pos indicates the use of part-of-speech tags as features.
Named Entity Recognition
The Top CoNLL 2003 systems all employed gazetteers or other types of specialized resources (e.g., lists of words that tend to co-occur with certain named entity types) in addition to part-of-speech tags .
part-of-speech tags is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Mintz, Mike and Bills, Steven and Snow, Rion and Jurafsky, Daniel
Features
Part-of-speech tags were assigned by a maximum entropy tagger trained on the Penn Tree-bank, and then simplified into seven categories: nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, numbers, foreign words, and everything else.
Features
Part-of-speech tags are not included in the dependency path.
Previous work
Hearst (1992) used a small number of regular expressions over words and part-of-speech tags to find examples of the hypernym relation.
Previous work
such as Ravichandran and Hovy (2002) and Pantel and Pennacchiotti (2006) use the same formalism of learning regular expressions over words and part-of-speech tags to discover patterns indicating a variety of relations.
part-of-speech tags is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: