| Analysis | By allowing appropriate violations to translate non-syntactic phrases according to particular syntactic contexts , our SDB model better inherits the strength of phrase-based approach than XP+. |
| Introduction | whether the current phrase can be translated as a unit or not within particular syntactic contexts (Fox, 2002)2, than that of constituent matching/violation. |
| Introduction | It is able to reward non-syntactic translations by assigning an adequate probability to them if these translations are appropriate to particular syntactic contexts on the source side, rather than always punish them. |
| The Syntax-Driven Bracketing Model 3.1 The Model | We consider this task as a binary-class classification problem: whether the current source phrase s is bracketable (1)) within particular syntactic contexts (7(3)). |
| The Syntax-Driven Bracketing Model 3.1 The Model | If two neighboring sub-phrases 31 and 32 are given, we can use more inner syntactic contexts to complete this binary classification task. |
| The Syntax-Driven Bracketing Model 3.1 The Model | new feature into the log-linear translation model: PSDB (b|T, This feature is computed by the SDB model described in equation (3) or equation (4), which estimates a probability that a source span is to be translated as a unit within particular syntactic contexts . |