Jigs and Lures: Associating Web Queries with Structured Entities
Pantel, Patrick and Fuxman, Ariel

Article Structure

Abstract

We propose methods for estimating the probability that an entity from an entity database is associated with a web search query.

Introduction

Commercial search engines use query associations in a variety of ways, including the recommendation of related queries in Bing, ‘something different’ in Google, and ‘also try’ and related concepts in Yahoo.

Related Work

We introduce a novel application of significant commercial value: entity recommendations for general Web queries.

Association Model

Task Definition: Consider a collection of entities E. Given a search query q, our task is to compute P(e|q), the probability that an entity 6 is relevant to q, for all e E E.

Entity Recommendation

Query recommendations are pervasive in commercial search engines.

Experimental Results

5.1 Datasets

Conclusion

Learning associations between web queries and entities has many possible applications, including query-entity recommendation, personalization by associating entity vectors to users, and direct advertising.

Topics

random sample

Appears in 4 sentences as: random sample (3) randomly sampled (2)
In Jigs and Lures: Associating Web Queries with Structured Entities
  1. Table 3 lists query-product associations for five randomly sampled products along with their model scores from Pmle Pintp.
    Page 7, “Experimental Results”
  2. We created two samples from the TEST dataset: one randomly sampled by taking click weights into account, and the other sampled uniformly at random.
    Page 7, “Experimental Results”
  3. Table 3: Example query-product association scores for a random sample of five products.
    Page 7, “Experimental Results”
  4. For our performance metrics, we sampled two sets of queries: (a) Query Set Sample: uniform random sample of 100 queries from the unique queries in the one-month log; and (b) Query Bag Sample: weighted random sample , by query frequency, of 100 queries from the query instances in the one-month log.
    Page 8, “Experimental Results”

See all papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention random sample.

See all papers in Proc. ACL that mention random sample.

Back to top.

co-occurrence

Appears in 3 sentences as: co-occurrence (3)
In Jigs and Lures: Associating Web Queries with Structured Entities
  1. Step 2 — Session Analysis: We build a query-entity frequency co-occurrence matrix, A, consisting of lel rows and nIEl columns, where each row corresponds to a query and each column to an entity.
    Page 5, “Entity Recommendation”
  2. 3'Note that this co-occurrence occurs because q’ was annotated with entity 6 in the same session as q occurred.
    Page 6, “Experimental Results”
  3. 5.3.1 Experimental Setup We instantiate our recommendation algorithm from Section 4.2 using session co-occurrence frequencies
    Page 7, “Experimental Results”

See all papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention co-occurrence.

See all papers in Proc. ACL that mention co-occurrence.

Back to top.

data sparsity

Appears in 3 sentences as: data sparsity (3)
In Jigs and Lures: Associating Web Queries with Structured Entities
  1. Smoothing techniques are proposed to address the inherent data sparsity in such graphs, including interpolation using a query synonymy model.
    Page 1, “Abstract”
  2. Smoothing techniques can be useful to alleviate data sparsity problems common in statistical models.
    Page 4, “Association Model”
  3. We expect our smoothing models to have much more impact on M SE (i.e., the tail) than on M SEW since head queries do not suffer from data sparsity .
    Page 6, “Experimental Results”

See all papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention data sparsity.

See all papers in Proc. ACL that mention data sparsity.

Back to top.

knowledge base

Appears in 3 sentences as: knowledge base (3)
In Jigs and Lures: Associating Web Queries with Structured Entities
  1. In this paper, we focus instead on associating surface contexts with entities that refer to a particular entry in a knowledge base such as Freebase, IMDB, Amazon’s product catalog, or The Library of Congress.
    Page 1, “Introduction”
  2. Clicked results in a vertical search engine are edges between queries and entities e in the vertical’s knowledge base .
    Page 3, “Association Model”
  3. Throughout our models, we make the simplifying assumption that the knowledge base E is complete.
    Page 3, “Association Model”

See all papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention knowledge base.

See all papers in Proc. ACL that mention knowledge base.

Back to top.

Model Parameters

Appears in 3 sentences as: model parameter (1) Model Parameters (1) model parameters (1)
In Jigs and Lures: Associating Web Queries with Structured Entities
  1. Basic Interpolation: This smoothing model, Pinw(e|q), linearly combines our foreground and background models using a model parameter 04:
    Page 5, “Association Model”
  2. Section 5.2 outlines our procedure for leam-ing the model parameters for both 15mm(e|q) and
    Page 5, “Association Model”
  3. 5.2.1 Model Parameters
    Page 6, “Experimental Results”

See all papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention Model Parameters.

See all papers in Proc. ACL that mention Model Parameters.

Back to top.