Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention
  • statistically significant
Habash, Nizar and Roth, Ryan
Results
However, the differences among this model and the other models using lem Table 4 are not statistically significant .
Results
The differences between this model and the other lower performing models are statistically significant (p<0.05).
Results
The differences among the last four models (all including lem) in Table 5 are not statistically significant .
statistically significant is mentioned in 6 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Bendersky, Michael and Croft, W. Bruce and Smith, David A.
Experiments
* and Jr denote statistically significant differences with i-QRY and i-PRF, respectively.
Experiments
In order to test the statistical significance of improvements attained by the proposed methods we use a two-sided Fisher’s randomization test with 20,000 permutations.
Experiments
Results with p-value < 0.05 are considered statistically significant .
statistically significant is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Rosenthal, Sara and McKeown, Kathleen
Experiments and Results
the averages of the accuracies from the 10 cross-validation runs and all results were compared for statistical significance using the t—test where applicable.
Experiments and Results
Unless otherwise marked, all accuracies are statistically significant at p<=.0005 for both baselines.
Experiments and Results
1 not statistically significant over Online-Behavior and Interests.
statistically significant is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: