Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2012 that mention
  • statistically significant
Constant, Matthieu and Sigogne, Anthony and Watrin, Patrick
Abstract
However, it has no statistically significant impact in terms of F-score as incorrect multiword expression recognition has important side effects on parsing.
Evaluation
In order to establish the statistical significance of results between two parsing experiments in terms of F1 and UAS, we used a unidirectional t-test for two independent samples”.
Evaluation
The statistical significance between two MWE identification experiments was established by using the McNemar—s test (Gillick and Cox, 1989).
Evaluation
The results of the two experiments are considered statistically significant with the computed value p < 0.01.
statistically significant is mentioned in 7 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Pauls, Adam and Klein, Dan
Experiments
The differences between scores marked with l are not statistically significant .
Experiments
Our model outperforms all other generative models, though the improvement over the 71- gram model is not statistically significant .
Experiments
We did not find that the use of our syntactic language model made any statistically significant increases in BLEU score.
statistically significant is mentioned in 5 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Druck, Gregory and Pang, Bo
Experiments
They provide statistically significant improvements in review and segment F1, as well as accuracy, over the baseline models.
Experiments
Augmenting RS-MiXMiX with sequential dependencies, yielding RS-MiXHMM, provides a moderate (though not statistically significant ) improvement in segment F1.
Experiments
As a result, in addition to yielding alignments, RSA-MiXHMM provides small improvements over RS-MiXHMM (though they are not statistically significant ).
statistically significant is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Green, Spence and DeNero, John
Discussion of Translation Results
We realized smaller, yet statistically significant , gains on the mixed genre data sets.
Discussion of Translation Results
The baseline contained 78 errors, while our system produced 66 errors, a statistically significant 15.4% error reduction at p S 0.01 according to a paired t-test.
Experiments
The MT06 result is statistically significant at p g 0.01; MT08 is significant at p g 0.02.
Experiments
We evaluated translation quality with BLEU-4 (Pa-pineni et al., 2002) and computed statistical significance with the approximate randomization method of Riezler and Maxwell (2005).9
statistically significant is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Xiong, Deyi and Zhang, Min and Li, Haizhou
Experiments
Statistical significance in BLEU differences
Experiments
Such an improvement is statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Experiments
Such a gain, which is statistically significant , confirms the effectiveness of semantic features.
statistically significant is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Chan, Wen and Zhou, Xiangdong and Wang, Wei and Chua, Tat-Seng
Experimental Results
The uparrow denotes the performance improvement compared to the precious method (above) with statistical significance under p value of 0.05, the short line ’-’ denotes there is no difference in statistical significance .
Experimental Results
which just utilize the independent sentence-level features, behave not vary well here, and there is no statistically significant performance difference between them.
Experimental Results
We also find that LCRF which utilizes the local context information between sentences perform better than the LR method in precision and F1 with statistical significance .
statistically significant is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Croce, Danilo and Moschitti, Alessandro and Basili, Roberto and Palmer, Martha
Experiments
We also derive statistical significance of the results by using the model described in (Yeh, 2000) and implemented in (Pado, 2006).
Experiments
Third, PTK, which produces more general structures, improves over BR by almost 1.5 ( statistically significant result) when using our dependency structures GRCT and LCT.
Experiments
Finally, the best model of SPTK (i.e, using LCT) improves over the best PTK (i.e., using LCT) by almost 1 point ( statistically significant result): this difference is only given by lexical similarity.
statistically significant is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian and Cheng, Justin and Kleinberg, Jon and Lee, Lillian
I’m ready for my closeup.
For the null hypothesis of random guessing, these results are statistically significant , p < 2‘6 m .016.
I’m ready for my closeup.
Table 2 shows that all the subjects performed (sometimes much) better than chance, and against the null hypothesis that all subjects are guessing randomly, the results are statistically significant , p < 2‘6 m .016.
Never send a human to do a machine’s job.
Accuracies statistically significantly greater than bag-of-words according to a two-tailed t-test are indicated with *(p<.05) and **(p<.01).
statistically significant is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Li, Zhenghua and Liu, Ting and Che, Wanxiang
Experiments and Analysis
The p—values in parentheses present the statistical significance of the improvements.
Experiments and Analysis
The improvements shown in parentheses are all statistically significant (p < 10—5).
Experiments and Analysis
The improvements shown in parentheses are all statistically significant (p < 10—5).
statistically significant is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: