Abstract | We show that MID is a maximum-likelihood estimator for the parameters of a Iinear—nonlinear—Poisson (LNP) model, and that the empirical single-spike information corresponds to the normalized log-likelihood under a Poisson model . |
Distributional assumptions implicit in MID | However, conditionally independent spiking is also the fundamental assumption underlying the Poisson model and, as we have shown, the standard MID estimator (based on the KL-divergence between histograms) is mathematically identical to the maximum likelihood estimator for an LNP model with piecewise constant nonlinearity. |
Equivalence of MID and maximum-likelihood LNP | In fact, the quantity —£lnp(90, D) can be considered an estimate for the marginal entropy of the response distribution, H (r) = —Z p(r) log p(r), since it is the average log-probability of the response under a Poisson model , independent of the stimulus. |
Generalizations | Spike-history dependencies can influence the single-bin spike count distribu-tion—for example, a Bernoulli model is more accurate than a Poisson model when the bin size is smaller than or equal to the refractory period, since the Poisson model assigns positive probability to the event of having 2 2 two spikes in a single bin. |
Models with Bernoulli spiking | Under the discrete-time inhomogeneous Poisson model considered above, spikes are modeled as conditionally independent given the stimulus, and the spike count in a discrete time bin has a Poisson distribution. |
Models with Bernoulli spiking | The Bernoulli and discrete-time Poisson models approach the same limiting Poisson process as the bin size (and single-bin spike probability) approaches zero while the average spike rate remains constant. |
Single-spike information and Poisson log-likelihood | Specifically, the empirical single-spike information is equal to the log-likelihood ratio between an inhomogeneous and homogeneous Poisson model of the repeat data (normalized by spike count): |
Single-spike information and Poisson log-likelihood | Where XML denotes the maximum-likelihood or plugin estimate of the time-varying spike rate (i.e., the PSTH itself), 2: is the mean spike rate across time, and £(9c;r) denotes the log-likeli-hood of the repeat data r under a Poisson model With time-varying rate 2v. |
Single-spike information and Poisson log-likelihood | Thus, even When estimated from raster data, Iss is equal to the difference between Poisson log-likelihoods under an inhomogeneous (rate-varying) and a homogeneous (constant rate) Poisson model , diVided by spike count (see also [57] ). |
Model | For the analytical treatment, the neurons in the output and lateral layers were modeled with a linear Poisson model . |
Model | In the main text, we performed all simulations With a linear Poisson model for analytical purposes, although we also confirmed those results With a conductance-based LIF model (81 Fig). |
Model | In the LIF model, synaptic weights develop in a manner similar to that for the linear Poisson model , although change occurs more rapidly (Fig IB, SIA Fig). |
Correction of the modulation index for deviations from the Poisson model | Correction of the modulation index for deviations from the Poisson model |
Correction of the modulation index for deviations from the Poisson model | The deviation of the spike train from the Poisson model results in an incorrect estimation of the modulation indeX. |
Correction of the modulation index for deviations from the Poisson model | (3) From this rate function, multiple new Poisson-like spike trains are generated, including the given deviations from the Poisson model . |
Discussion | In real neurons, there are deviations from the Poisson model . |
Discussion | The general rate function model could be eXpanded to accommodate for other deviations from the Poisson model , such as relative refractory period and bursting activity; i.e., an elevated firing probability immediately after the refractory period. |
Results | However, real neurons deviate from the Poisson model , primarily as a result of the refractory period. |