Analytical Models of Distribution of Affinity, Equilibrium Constants, Specificity and Kinetics | In this study, the first passage time(FPT) to reach the native binding state(the time required for the random walker to visit order parameter RMSD ~ 0 for the first time) is used as a typical or representative time scale for binding. |
Microscopic Atomic Binding Model and Simulation Results | In Fig 10A—10C, we also show the one dimensional projection of binding free energy landscape to RMSD with different ligands with different intrinsic specificity characterized by ISR. |
Simulations | In this report, we use the RMSD as an order parameter ( RMSD represents the root mean square distance relative to the native binding structure) that represents the progress of binding towards native state. |
Simulations | For activation process, the order parameter or reaction coordinate RMSD is likely to be locally connected. |
Simulations | It is straightforward to see that the overall kinetic process involves diffusion in order parameter RMSD space. |
Theory and Analytical Models | We can use RMSD as order parameter to describe the position of an ensemble of states in the landscape. |
Computational identification of stabilizing single point mutations | Of the 3,021 mutations, 523 mutations (17.3%) were predicted to have a stabilizing effect according to all three metrics (energy, contacts, and RMSD ), while 421% of |
Computational identification of stabilizing single point mutations | (A) RMSD vs. simulation temperature. |
Computational identification of stabilizing single point mutations | The simulated Tm values evaluated using RMSD , total energy, and number of contacts are strongly correlated, as shown in Fig. |
Computational test of the theoretical analysis | As mentioned, the simulated Tm values evaluated using RMSD , total energy, and number of contacts are strongly correlated in our simulations as shown in Fig. |
Monte Carlo protein unfolding simulation | As shown in figures 82 Fig—S4 Fig, the RMSD and total energy increased and the number of contacts decreased as each simulation proceeded, and with increasing temperature. |
Monte Carlo protein unfolding simulation | Plots of RMSD and contact number vs. temperature showed sigmoidal behavior, with a clearly identifiable transition temperature, and the melting temperature (Tm) could be determined by fitting to a sigmoidal function (Fig. |
Monte Carlo simulations | A 2,000,000-step simulation was then run at each of 32 temperatures, averaging over all 2,000,000 steps to obtain Energy, RMSD , and number of contacts. |
Monte Carlo simulations | Data was then plotted and fit to a sigmoid to obtain the computationally-predicted melting temperature, for each of Energy, RMSD , and number of contacts. |
Supporting Information | RMSD is averaged over 50 replications. |
Periodic B-Z junction in (CAG)6. (CAG)6 duplex | A high RMSD of 8.2(0.5)A beyond 25ns (Fig. |
Periodic B-Z junction in (CAG)6. (CAG)6 duplex | Above conformational rearrangements result in a high RMSD of ~8A at the end of the simulation (816 Fig). |
Results | Root mean square deviation ( RMSD ) calculated over 300ns simulation indicates the existence of three different ensembles (Fig. |
Results | 1B): the first ensemble persists till ~16.5ns with RMSD centered around 2.8(0.7)A, the second one persists between 16.5-181ns with a RMSD of 4.7(0.7)A and the third one persists beyond ~181ns with the highest RMSD of 6.2(0.8)A. |
Results | Intriguingly, a high RMSD of 4.5(0.6)A observed between 16.5-100ns is associated with a change in glycosyl conformation of mismatched A23 and A8 from the starting anti conformation to syn conformation. |
Supporting Information | Note that While the latter attains the RMSD of ~8 A very early in the simulation, the former attains the RMSD of ~8 A only ~200ns as indicated by solid arrows. |
Supporting Information | .anti starting glycosyl conformation: one With RMSD of ~5 A during 200ns and other With RMSD of ~8 A beyond 200ns. |
Convergence of the simulated ensembles | Importantly, the profiles calculated using the last 80-ns segments of the control and folding runs agree very well, with an overall RMSD of 0.014. |
Convergence of the simulated ensembles | The correlation coefficient of the two contact maps is 0.91 and the RMSD is 0.016. |
Mutant modulation of p53-TAD local and long-range conformations | Clustering analysis With 5 A COL RMSD cutoff leads to numerous small clusters for all ensembles, With very feW clusters occupied over 1% (see 83—88 Figs). |
Residue Number | The correlation efficient of two contacts is 0.91 and the RMSD is 0.016. |
Structural, clustering and NMR analysis | The resulting 4000-member ensembles were clustered using the fixed radius clustering algorithm as implemented in the MMTSB/ensclusterpl tool (with—kclust option), with a cutoff radius of 5 A Cor root-mean-square distance ( RMSD ). |