Discussion | 4) Detectability of changes of synaptic weights follows same rules and has same limitations as detection of individual synaptic connections . |
Discussion | These recordings provide a link between properties of synaptic connections typically measured in intracellular experiments in vitro, such as PSC amplitude, and estimates of connectivity made from in vivo extracellular recordings, such as inferred functional connectivity and coupling strength. |
Discussion | Here we have neglected these effects in order to simplify our analyses and determine the basic constraints of what can be inferred about simulated synaptic connectivity from spiking of neuronal ensembles. |
U | Statistical inference of synaptic connections of different strength from spike trains. |
U | D) Detectability of synaptic connections from spike trains: Dependence of the log likelihood ratio between Models M1 and M2 on the input amplitude. |
U | Detectability of synaptic connections from spike trains depends strongly on how much data is available. |
input experiments. | In typical multi-electrode spike recordings grouping information would not be available, and PSCs at different synaptic connections would have different shapes. |
Functional connectivity as a network of pairwise interactions | Such signatures are ambiguous as they can arise from network effects other than direct synaptic connections [66]. |
Functional connectivity as a network of pairwise interactions | Although some investigators have interpreted such correlations as indicators of (chemical or electrical) synaptic connectivity , most used them as more general indicators of functional connectivity without relating them to underlying mechanisms. |
Functional connectivity as a network of pairwise interactions | Since neurons form synaptic connections mostly locally and sparsely [78] , we a priori favored solutions with sparse partial correlations. |
Functional connectivity as coactivations | Coactivation patterns and pairwise connectivity are not mutually exclusive since assemblies arise from patterns of synaptic connectivity . |
Introduction | Functional connectivity reflects local synaptic connections , shared inputs from other regions, and endogenous network activity. |
Introduction | In addition, noise correlations and correlations in spontaneous activity have been hypothesized to reflect aspects of synaptic connectivity [12]. |
Introduction | Interest in neural correlations has been sustained by a series of discoveries of their nontrivial relationships to various aspects of circuit organization such as the physical distances between the neurons [13, 14], their synaptic connectivity [15], stimulus response similarity [3—5, 15—22] , cell types [23], cortical layer specificity [24, 25], progressive changes in development and in learning [26—28], changes due to sensory stimulation and global brain states [21, 29—33]. |
Physiological interpretation and future directions | Indeed, the relationships between patterns of positive and negative connectivities inferred by the estimator resembled the properties of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connectivities with respect to distance, cortical layers, and feature tuning [23, 78, 93—98]. |
Physiological interpretation and future directions | To further investigate the link between synaptic connectivity and inferred functional connectivity, in future experiments, we will use molecular markers for various cell types with followup multiple whole-cell in vitro recordings [23, 28] to directly compare the inferred functional connectivity graphs to the underlying anatomical circuitry. |