Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2008 that mention
  • relation extraction
Li, Zhifei and Yarowsky, David
Conclusions
Our method exploits the data co-occarrence phenomena that is very useful for relation extractions .
Experimental Results
Table 4: F all-abbreviation Relation Extraction Precision
Experimental Results
To further show the advantage of our relation extraction algorithm (see Section 3.3), in the third column of Table 4 we report the results on a simple baseline.
Experimental Results
As shown in Table 4, the baseline performs significantly worse than our relation extraction algorithm.
Unsupervised Translation Induction for Chinese Abbreviations
3.3 F all-abbreviation Relation Extraction from Chinese Monolingual Corpora
Unsupervised Translation Induction for Chinese Abbreviations
3.3.2 F all-abbreviation Relation Extraction Algorithm
Unsupervised Translation Induction for Chinese Abbreviations
Figure 2 presents the pseudocode of the full-abbreviation relation extraction algorithm.
relation extraction is mentioned in 10 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Banko, Michele and Etzioni, Oren
Abstract
raditional Relation Extraction
Conclusions and Future Work
We also plan to explore the capacity of Open IE to automatically provide labeled training data, when traditional relation extraction is a more appropriate choice.
Hybrid Relation Extraction
4.2 Stacked Relation Extraction
Introduction
Relation Extraction (RE) is the task of recognizing the assertion of a particular relationship between two or more entities in text.
Relation Extraction
Given a relation name, labeled examples of the relation, and a corpus, traditional Relation Extraction (RE) systems output instances of the given relation found in the corpus.
Relation Extraction
Figure 1: Relation Extraction as Sequence Labeling: A CRF is used to identify the relationship, born in, between Kafka and Prague
Relation Extraction
Linear-chain CRFs have been applied to a variety of sequential text processing tasks including named-entity recognition, part-of—speech tagging, word segmentation, semantic role identification, and recently relation extraction (Culotta et al., 2006).
The Nature of Relations in English
In this section, we show that many relationships are consistently expressed using a compact set of relation-independent lexico-syntactic patterns, and quantify their frequency based on a sample of 500 sentences selected at random from an IE training corpus developed by (Bunescu and Mooney, 2007).1 This observation helps to explain the success of open relation extraction , which learns a relation-independent extraction model as described in Section 3.1.
relation extraction is mentioned in 9 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Bhagat, Rahul and Ravichandran, Deepak
Abstract
We further show that we can use these paraphrases to generate surface patterns for relation extraction .
Conclusion
While we believe that more work needs to be done to improve the system recall (some of which we are investigating), this seems to be a good first step towards developing a minimally supervised, easy to implement, and scalable relation extraction system.
Experimental Methodology
5.3 Relation Extraction
Experimental Results
Relation Extraction
Experimental Results
Relation Extraction
Experimental Results
Moving to the task of relation extraction , we see from table 5 that our system has a much lower relative recall compared to the baseline.
Introduction
Claim 2: These paraphrases can then be used for generating high precision surface patterns for relation extraction .
Related Work
Another task related to our work is relation extraction .
relation extraction is mentioned in 8 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: