Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2010 that mention
  • similarity scores
Chen, Boxing and Foster, George and Kuhn, Roland
Abstract
The sense similarity scores are computed by using the vector space model.
Abstract
Similarity scores are used as additional features of the translation model to improve translation performance.
Analysis and Discussion
In Alg2, the similarity score consists of three parts as in Equation (14): sim(Cf“”,C;""c) , sim(Cf‘”,C§""c) , and sim(C§°oc,C:""C) ; where sim(CJf.0°C,C:0“) could be computed by IBM model 1 probabilities simIBM(C;0“,C:OOC) or cosine distance similarity function simCOS(C;OOC,C:W) .
Analysis and Discussion
The monolingual similarity scores give it the ability to avoid “dangerous” words, and choose alternatives (such as larger phrase translations) when available.
Analysis and Discussion
We then combine the two similarity scores by using both of them as features to see if we could obtain further improvement.
Experiments
The sense similarity scores are used as feature functions in the translation model.
similarity scores is mentioned in 9 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Shezaf, Daphna and Rappoport, Ari
Abstract
Our algorithm introduces nonaligned signatures (NAS), a cross-lingual word context similarity score that avoids the over-constrained and inefficient nature of alignment-based methods.
Algorithm
We now rank the candidates according to the nonaligned signatures (NAS) similarity score , which assesses the similarity between each candidate’s signature and that of the headword.
Algorithm
3.4 Nonaligned Signatures (NAS) Similarity Scoring
Conclusion
At the heart of our method is the nonaligned signatures (NAS) context similarity score , used for removing incorrect translations using cross-lingual co-occurrences.
Conclusion
The common method for context similarity scoring utilizes some algebraic distance between context vectors, and requires a single alignment of context vectors in one language into the other.
Introduction
We present the nonaligned signatures (NAS) similarity score for signature and use it to rank these translations.
Lexicon Generation Experiments
In this way, the two scores are ‘plugged’ into our method and serve as baselines for our NAS similarity score .
similarity scores is mentioned in 7 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Berant, Jonathan and Dagan, Ido and Goldberger, Jacob
Experimental Evaluation
When computing distributional similarity scores , a template is represented as a feature vector of the CUIs that instantiate its arguments.
Learning Entailment Graph Edges
Next, we represent each pair of propositional templates with a feature vector of various distributional similarity scores .
Learning Entailment Graph Edges
A template pair is represented by a feature vector where each coordinate is a different distributional similarity score .
Learning Entailment Graph Edges
We then generate for any (t1, t2) features that are the 12 distributional similarity scores using all combinations of the dimensions.
similarity scores is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: