Experimental Results | We trained the model on a portion of FBIS data that has been used previously for alignment model evaluation (Ayan and Dorr, 2006; Haghighi et al., 2009; DeNero and Klein, 2010). |
Introduction | This result is achieved by embedding two directional HMM-based alignment models into a larger bidirectional graphical model. |
Introduction | Moreover, the bidirectional model enforces a one-to-one phrase alignment structure, similar to the output of phrase alignment models (Marcu and Wong, 2002; DeNero et al., 2008), unsupervised inversion transduction grammar (ITG) models (Blunsom et al., 2009), and supervised ITG models (Haghighi et al., 2009; DeNero and Klein, 2010). |
Model Definition | Our model contains two directional hidden Markov alignment models , which we review in Section 2.1, along with additional structure that that we introduce in Section 2.2. |
Model Definition | 2.1 HMM-Based Alignment Model |
Model Definition | This section describes the classic hidden Markov model (HMM) based alignment model (Vogel et al., 1996). |
Related Work | In addition, supervised word alignment models often use the output of directional unsupervised aligners as features or pruning signals. |
Related Work | This approach to jointly learning two directional alignment models yields state-of-the-art unsupervised performance. |
Experiments | 4.3 Integration into Word Alignment Model |
Experiments | 4.3.1 Modified EM Training of the Word Alignment Models |
Experiments | The normal translation probability pta( f |e) of the word alignment models is computed with relative frequency estimates. |
Experimental Evaluation | This is the first reported result in which an unsupervised phrase alignment model has built a phrase table directly from model probabilities and achieved results that compare to heuristic phrase extraction. |
Hierarchical ITG Model | Previous research has used a variety of sampling methods to learn Bayesian phrase based alignment models (DeNero et al., 2008; Blunsom et al., 2009; Blunsom and Cohn, 2010). |
Introduction | The model is similar to previously proposed phrase alignment models based on inversion transduction grammars (ITGs) (Cherry and Lin, 2007; Zhang et al., 2008; Blunsom et al., 2009), with one important change: ITG symbols and phrase pairs are generated in the opposite order. |