Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention
  • alignment models
DeNero, John and Macherey, Klaus
Experimental Results
We trained the model on a portion of FBIS data that has been used previously for alignment model evaluation (Ayan and Dorr, 2006; Haghighi et al., 2009; DeNero and Klein, 2010).
Introduction
This result is achieved by embedding two directional HMM-based alignment models into a larger bidirectional graphical model.
Introduction
Moreover, the bidirectional model enforces a one-to-one phrase alignment structure, similar to the output of phrase alignment models (Marcu and Wong, 2002; DeNero et al., 2008), unsupervised inversion transduction grammar (ITG) models (Blunsom et al., 2009), and supervised ITG models (Haghighi et al., 2009; DeNero and Klein, 2010).
Model Definition
Our model contains two directional hidden Markov alignment models , which we review in Section 2.1, along with additional structure that that we introduce in Section 2.2.
Model Definition
2.1 HMM-Based Alignment Model
Model Definition
This section describes the classic hidden Markov model (HMM) based alignment model (Vogel et al., 1996).
Related Work
In addition, supervised word alignment models often use the output of directional unsupervised aligners as features or pruning signals.
Related Work
This approach to jointly learning two directional alignment models yields state-of-the-art unsupervised performance.
alignment models is mentioned in 15 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Sajjad, Hassan and Fraser, Alexander and Schmid, Helmut
Experiments
4.3 Integration into Word Alignment Model
Experiments
4.3.1 Modified EM Training of the Word Alignment Models
Experiments
The normal translation probability pta( f |e) of the word alignment models is computed with relative frequency estimates.
alignment models is mentioned in 5 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Neubig, Graham and Watanabe, Taro and Sumita, Eiichiro and Mori, Shinsuke and Kawahara, Tatsuya
Experimental Evaluation
This is the first reported result in which an unsupervised phrase alignment model has built a phrase table directly from model probabilities and achieved results that compare to heuristic phrase extraction.
Hierarchical ITG Model
Previous research has used a variety of sampling methods to learn Bayesian phrase based alignment models (DeNero et al., 2008; Blunsom et al., 2009; Blunsom and Cohn, 2010).
Introduction
The model is similar to previously proposed phrase alignment models based on inversion transduction grammars (ITGs) (Cherry and Lin, 2007; Zhang et al., 2008; Blunsom et al., 2009), with one important change: ITG symbols and phrase pairs are generated in the opposite order.
alignment models is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: