Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention
  • best results
Rosenthal, Sara and McKeown, Kathleen
Abstract
Our best results allow for 81.57% accuracy.
Experiments and Results
However, as shown in Figure 4, style and content combined provided the best results .
Experiments and Results
We found the best results to have an accuracy of 79.96% and 81.57% for 1979 and 1984 respectively using BOW, interests, online behavior, and all lexical-stylistic features.
best results is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Rüd, Stefan and Ciaramita, Massimiliano and Müller, Jens and Schütze, Hinrich
Experimental setup
ALL scores Significantly different from the best results for the three datasets (lines c7, i8, k7) are marked >|< (see text).
Results and discussion
This subset always includes the best results and a number of other combinations where feature groups are added to or removed from the optimal combination.
Results and discussion
On line k7, we show results for this run for KDD-T and for runs that differ by one feature group (lines k2—k6, k8).9 The overall best result (43.8%) is achieved when using all feature groups (line k8).
best results is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: