A Simple Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm | (2) find the highest scoring derivation using dynamic programming |
A Simple Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm | Steps 1 and 2 can be performed efficiently; in particular, we avoid the classical dynamic programming intersection, instead relying on dynamic programming over the original, simple hypergraph. |
A Simple Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm | 0 Using dynamic programming , find values for the yv and ye variables that form a valid derivation, and that maximize |
Abstract | The approach uses Lagrangian relaxation to decompose the decoding problem into tractable sub-problems, thereby avoiding exhaustive dynamic programming . |
Introduction | Exact dynamic programming algorithms for the problem are well known (Bar-Hillel et al., 1964), but are too expensive to be used in practice.2 Previous work on decoding for syntax-based SMT has therefore been focused primarily on approximate search methods. |
Introduction | Dynamic programming over the weighted hypergraph. |
Introduction | We do this by gradually introducing constraints to step 1 ( dynamic programming over the hypergraph), while still maintaining efficiency. |
The Full Algorithm | The second step involves simple dynamic programming over the hypergraph (V, E) (it is simple to integrate the 68 terms into this algorithm). |
The Full Algorithm | The main steps of the algorithm are: 1) construction of the graph (8, T); 2) at each iteration, dynamic programming over the hypergraph (V, E); 3) at each iteration, all-pairs shortest path algorithms over the graph (8, T). |
The Full Algorithm | steps—hypergraph dynamic programming , and all-pairs shortest path—are widely known algorithms that are simple to implement. |
Introduction | General algorithms for parsing LCFRSs build a dynamic programming chart of recognized nonterminals bottom-up, in a manner analogous to the CKY algorithm for CFGs (Hopcroft and Ullman, 1979), but with time and space complexity that are dependent on the rank and fanout of the grammar rules. |
Introduction | Whenever it is possible, binarization of LCFRS rules, or reduction of rank to two, is therefore important for parsing, as it reduces the time complexity needed for dynamic programming . |
LCFRSs and parsing complexity | Existing parsing algorithms for LCFRSs exploit dynamic programming . |
LCFRSs and parsing complexity | AS an example, in the case of parsing based on CFGS, nonterminals as well as partial parses all have fanout one, resulting in the standard time complexity of O(|w|3) of dynamic programming methods. |