Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2011 that mention
  • dynamic programming
Rush, Alexander M. and Collins, Michael
A Simple Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm
(2) find the highest scoring derivation using dynamic programming
A Simple Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm
Steps 1 and 2 can be performed efficiently; in particular, we avoid the classical dynamic programming intersection, instead relying on dynamic programming over the original, simple hypergraph.
A Simple Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithm
0 Using dynamic programming , find values for the yv and ye variables that form a valid derivation, and that maximize
Abstract
The approach uses Lagrangian relaxation to decompose the decoding problem into tractable sub-problems, thereby avoiding exhaustive dynamic programming .
Introduction
Exact dynamic programming algorithms for the problem are well known (Bar-Hillel et al., 1964), but are too expensive to be used in practice.2 Previous work on decoding for syntax-based SMT has therefore been focused primarily on approximate search methods.
Introduction
Dynamic programming over the weighted hypergraph.
Introduction
We do this by gradually introducing constraints to step 1 ( dynamic programming over the hypergraph), while still maintaining efficiency.
The Full Algorithm
The second step involves simple dynamic programming over the hypergraph (V, E) (it is simple to integrate the 68 terms into this algorithm).
The Full Algorithm
The main steps of the algorithm are: 1) construction of the graph (8, T); 2) at each iteration, dynamic programming over the hypergraph (V, E); 3) at each iteration, all-pairs shortest path algorithms over the graph (8, T).
The Full Algorithm
steps—hypergraph dynamic programming , and all-pairs shortest path—are widely known algorithms that are simple to implement.
dynamic programming is mentioned in 14 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Crescenzi, Pierluigi and Gildea, Daniel and Marino, Andrea and Rossi, Gianluca and Satta, Giorgio
Introduction
General algorithms for parsing LCFRSs build a dynamic programming chart of recognized nonterminals bottom-up, in a manner analogous to the CKY algorithm for CFGs (Hopcroft and Ullman, 1979), but with time and space complexity that are dependent on the rank and fanout of the grammar rules.
Introduction
Whenever it is possible, binarization of LCFRS rules, or reduction of rank to two, is therefore important for parsing, as it reduces the time complexity needed for dynamic programming .
LCFRSs and parsing complexity
Existing parsing algorithms for LCFRSs exploit dynamic programming .
LCFRSs and parsing complexity
AS an example, in the case of parsing based on CFGS, nonterminals as well as partial parses all have fanout one, resulting in the standard time complexity of O(|w|3) of dynamic programming methods.
dynamic programming is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: