Abstract | Experimental results show our proposed approach discovers dramatically more accurate clusters than models without sense disambiguation , and that incorporating global features, such as the document theme, is crucial. |
Conclusion | Experimental results show our approach discovers precise relation clusters and outperforms a generative model approach and a clustering method which does not address sense disambiguation . |
Evaluations | Without using sense disambiguation , the performance of hierarchical clustering decreases significantly, losing 17% in precision in the pairwise measure, and 15% in terms of B3. |
Evaluations | The clusters produced by HAC (without sense disambiguation ) is coherent if all the paths in one relation take a particular sense. |
Experiments | For the sense disambiguation model, we set the number of topics (senses) to 50. |
Experiments | One sense per path (HAC): This system uses only hierarchical clustering to discover relations, skipping sense disambiguation . |
Our Approach | 2.1 Sense Disambiguation |
Related Work | Selectional preferences discovery (Ritter et al., 2010; Seaghdha, 2010) can help path sense disambiguation , however, we show that using global features performs better than entity type features. |
Related Work | And our sense disambiguation model is inspired by this work. |
Related Work | Our approach employs generative models for path sense disambiguation , which achieves better performance than directly applying generative models to unsupervised relation discovery. |
Abstract | Previous research has conflicting conclusions on whether word sense disambiguation (WSD) systems can improve information retrieval (IR) performance. |
Introduction | Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is the task of identifying the correct meaning of a word in context. |
Word Sense Disambiguation | 4.1 Word sense disambiguation system |