Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2013 that mention
  • PageRank
Ogura, Yukari and Kobayashi, Ichiro
Abstract
On the other hand, we apply the PageRank algorithm to rank important words in each document.
Introduction
Whereas, we apply the PageRank algorithm (Brin et al., 1998) for the issue, because the algorithm scores the centrality of a node in a graph, and important words should be regarded as having the centrality (Hassan et al., 2007).
Related studies
ment for text classification, there are many studies which use the PageRank algorithm.
Related studies
They apply topic-specific PageRank to a graph of both words and documents, and introduce Polarity PageRank , a new semi-supervised sentiment classifier that integrates lexicon induction with document classification.
Related studies
As a study related to topic detection by important words obtained by the PageRank algorithm, Kubek et al.
Techniques for text classification
In particular, (Hassan et al., 2007) shows that the PageRank score is more clear to rank important words rather than tfidf.
Techniques for text classification
In this study, we refer to their method and use PageRank algorithm to decide important words.
PageRank is mentioned in 31 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Feng, Song and Kang, Jun Seok and Kuznetsova, Polina and Choi, Yejin
Connotation Induction Algorithms
We develop induction algorithms based on three distinct types of algorithmic framework that have been shown successful for the analogous task of sentiment lexicon induction: HITS & PageRank (§2.1), Label/Graph Propagation (§2.2), and Constraint Optimization via Integer Linear Programming (§2.3).
Connotation Induction Algorithms
2.1 HITS & PageRank
Connotation Induction Algorithms
(2011) explored the use of HITS (Kleinberg, 1999) and PageRank (Page et al., 1999) to induce the general connotation of words hinging on the linguistic phenomena of selectional preference and semantic prosody, i.e., connotative predicates influencing the connotation of their arguments.
Experimental Result I
We find that the use of label propagation alone [PRED-ARG (CP)] improves the performance substantially over the comparable graph construction with different graph analysis algorithms, in particular, HITS and PageRank approaches of Feng et al.
PageRank is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher and Jurgens, David and Navigli, Roberto
A Unified Semantic Representation
To construct each semantic signature, we use the iterative method for calculating topic-sensitive PageRank (Haveliwala, 2002).
A Unified Semantic Representation
The PageRank may then be computed using:
A Unified Semantic Representation
For our semantic signatures we used the UKB2 off-the-shelf implementation of topic-sensitive PageRank .
Experiment 1: Textual Similarity
As our WSD system, we used UKB, a state-of-the-art knowledge-based WSD system that is based on the same topic-sensitive PageRank algorithm used by our approach.
PageRank is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Li, Fangtao and Gao, Yang and Zhou, Shuchang and Si, Xiance and Dai, Decheng
Experiments
When using the user graph as feature, we compute the authority score for each user with PageRank as shown in Equation 1.
Proposed Features
PageRank Score: We employ the PageRank (Page et al., 1999) score of each URL as popularity score.
Proposed Features
We compute the user’s authority score (AS) based on the link analysis algorithm PageRank:
PageRank is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: