Index of papers in April 2015 that mention
  • regulatory network
Daifeng Wang, Koon-Kiu Yan, Cristina Sisu, Chao Cheng, Joel Rozowsky, William Meyerson, Mark B. Gerstein
Abstract
To this end, we present Loregic, a computational method integrating gene expression and regulatory network data, to characterize the cooperativity of regulatory factors.
Applications
We extracted gene regulatory network data from the ENCODE leukemia cell line, K562, and gene and miRNA eXpression datasets for AML from TCGA.
Introduction
At a high level, the gene regulatory network can be regarded as analogous to an electronic circuit insofar as both gene networks and electronic circuits have inputs and outputs related by certain rules.
Introduction
While this model is not able to capture the very complex regulatory patterns that may be characterized by continuous models [12,13], it is computationally efficient, and it is comprehensive enough to meaningfully describe a large variety of regulatory networks on a genome-wide scale in multiple organisms.
Introduction
By combining the activity of RFs and their respective targets on a genome-wide scale, a bigger picture emerges: the gene regulatory network .
Loregic applications for other regulatory features
FFLs have been found to be important motifs in regulatory networks , With many interacting by following logic operations [11].
Results
Loregic takes as inputs two types of data: a regulatory network (defined by RFs and their target genes) and a binarized gene expression dataset across multiple samples.
Results
Input gene regulatory network consisting of regulatory factors and their target genes;
Results
Finally, Steps CF are repeated for all triplets in the regulatory network , and all logic-gate-consistent triplets are identified.
regulatory network is mentioned in 17 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Tor D. Wager, Jian Kang, Timothy D. Johnson, Thomas E. Nichols, Ajay B. Satpute, Lisa Feldman Barrett
Emotional Signatures Across Networks and Regions of Interest
Mean intensity values for each region/ network served as nodes in co-activation analyses.
Network Co-activation Differences among Emotion Categories
By saving the average intensity values for each region/ network from each MCMC iteration, we were able to estimate the co-activation intensity as the correlation between average intensity values for each pair of regions.
Supporting Information
Average co-activation Within and between each region/ network grouping, for comparison to global network efficiency values based on path length in Fig.
regulatory network is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: