QM/MM methods | Determination of the reaction free energy profile using QM(DFTB)/MM and Multiple steered molecular dynamics (MSMD) strategy. |
QM/MM methods | To determine the free energy of the reaction we used the MSMD method [56,57] which allows to link non equilibrium pulling trajectories with equilibrium properties like the free energy, and has been extensively used in our group to determine free energy profiles[57—60]. |
QM/MM methods | AG(>L) and W(>L) are the change in free energy and the external work performed on the system as it evolves from k 2 k0 to k, respectively. |
Results | Secondly, we analyzed the “forbidden” conformation and finally, we determined the free energy profile of the sulfenic acid to cyclic sulfenyl amide reaction using QM/MM methods in human PTPlB. |
Results | We initially analyzed the free energy difference between the forbidden-psi conformation and allowed helix conformation. |
Results | 3B allows an estimation of how much energy proteins must pay to constraint the Cys in the reactive (forbidden-psi) conformation using the Ramachandran plot derived free energy , estimated it around 5.5 kcal/mol. |
Bayesian parameter estimation and model comparison | Importantly, the algorithm also provides the free energy P, which is an approximation to the model evidence. |
Bayesian parameter estimation and model comparison | This free energy approach yields better model scores than does the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) [95]. |
Bayesian parameter estimation and model comparison | The optimal set of parameters, i.e., that obtained from the initialization that resulted in the maximal free energy , is reported in this manuscript. |