Index of papers in Proc. ACL 2013 that mention
  • binarization
Büchse, Matthias and Koller, Alexander and Vogler, Heiko
Abstract
Binarization of grammars is crucial for improving the complexity and performance of parsing and translation.
Abstract
We present a versatile binarization algorithm that can be tailored to a number of grammar formalisms by simply varying a formal parameter.
Abstract
We apply our algorithm to binarizing tree-to-string transducers used in syntax-based machine translation.
Introduction
Binarization amounts to transforming a given grammar into an equivalent grammar of rank 2, i.e., with at most two nonterminals on any right-hand side.
Introduction
The ability to binarize grammars is crucial for efficient parsing, because for many grammar formalisms the parsing complexity depends exponentially on the rank of the grammar.
Introduction
The classical approach to binarization , as known from the Chomsky normal form transformation for context-free grammars (CFGs), proceeds rule by rule.
binarization is mentioned in 88 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Zhang, Yuan and Barzilay, Regina and Globerson, Amir
Features
Note that after binarization , grandparent and sibling information becomes very important in encoding the structure.
Implementation
This section introduces important implementation details, including supertagging, feature forest pruning and binarization methods.
Implementation
5.3 Binarization
Implementation
Since Penn Treebank trees are not binarized, we construct a simple procedure for binarizing them.
The Learning Problem
Note that the two derivations share the same ( binarized ) tree structure.
binarization is mentioned in 10 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Zhang, Meishan and Zhang, Yue and Che, Wanxiang and Liu, Ting
Character-based Chinese Parsing
The system can provide bina-rzied CFG trees in Chomsky Norm Form, and they present a reversible conversion procedure to map arbitrary CFG trees into binarized trees.
Character-based Chinese Parsing
In this work, we remain consistent with their work, using the head-finding rules of Zhang and Clark (2008), and the same binarization algorithm.1 We apply the same beam-search algorithm for decoding, and employ the averaged perceptron with early-update to train our model.
Word Structures and Syntax Trees
Our annotations are binarized recursive word
Word Structures and Syntax Trees
(Los Angeles)”, have flat structures, and we use “coordination” for their left binarization .
binarization is mentioned in 4 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper:
Chiang, David and Andreas, Jacob and Bauer, Daniel and Hermann, Karl Moritz and Jones, Bevan and Knight, Kevin
Abstract
We present a more precise characterization of the algorithm’s complexity, an optimization analogous to binarization of context-free grammars, and some important implementation details, resulting in an algorithm that is practical for natural-language applications.
Introduction
We give a more precise complexity analysis in terms of the grammar and the size and maximum degree of the input graph, and we show how to optimize it by a process analogous to binarization of CFGs, following Gildea (2011).
Parsing
In this section, we present a refinement that makes the rule-matching procedure explicit, and because it matches rules little by little, similarly to binarization of CFG rules, it does so more efliciently than the original.
binarization is mentioned in 3 sentences in this paper.
Topics mentioned in this paper: